“We are deeply committed to fairness and accuracy in our journalism, and when we fall short, we correct our errors publicly, as we did in this case.” We set the record straight with a correction,” the spokesperson told me. “We published an editorial about an important topic that contained an inaccuracy. A spokesperson for the paper told me before the trial started that it hopes to “reaffirm a foundational principle of American law: public figures should not be permitted to use libel suits to punish unintentional errors by news organizations.” Palin’s lawyers didn’t comment ahead of the trial, but The Times did. “Or, to put things a bit more sharply, the case will help demarcate the line between really bad journalism and libelous journalism.” “At issue is the elasticity of the protections that allow news organizations to present tough coverage of public figures,” Washington Post’s Erik Wemple wrote recently. Palin has argued The Times did, and The Times has said it made an honest error. Specifically, the standard that a public figure must prove an outlet operated with “actual malice” when it published defamatory information. The case is, at its heart, about the limits of First Amendment protections and the standard set in the landmark New York Times vs. But a federal appeals court revived it and, as a result, a trial will now take place. The Times corrected the error and apologized for it, and a judge initially dismissed the case. Gabby Giffords to a map circulated by Palin’s PAC that showed certain electoral districts under crosshairs. A quick recap: Palin sued the paper in 2017 over an editorial that incorrectly linked the 2011 shooting of Rep. The trial over Sarah Palin’s defamation lawsuit against the newspaper is finally underway after a short delay prompted by Palin’s positive Covid-19 test. The next few days will not be very enjoyable for The New York Times. A version of this article first appeared in the “Reliable Sources” newsletter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |